Wedding Package and damage from "ruined holiday"

Author/s Francesca Orti
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/35 Language Italian
Pages 26 P. 65-90 File size 229 KB
DOI 10.3280/DT2022-035005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Court of Florence rejected, for lack of evidence, the compensation request for damage deriving from "ruined vacation" proposed by a couple who, after purchasing a tourist package that included the celebration of the wedding on a Hawaiian beach, had complained about some shortcomings: lack of ocean view from the hotel room, as stated in the catalog; celebra-tion of the ceremony on a beach other than the one agreed upon; failure to recognize the mar-riage celebrated in Italy due to lack of Apostille validation. After outlining the regulatory framework and recalling the jurisprudential precedents on the subject concerning "ruined vacation damage" in relation to honeymoons, the A. stressed the tourist operator’s duty to inform in the asymmetry information with the tourist/consumer, also with reference to misleading advertising profiles due to failure to match the content of the information operator’s cata-log.

Francesca Orti, Wedding package e danno da "vacanza rovinata" in "RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO DEL TURISMO" 35/2022, pp 65-90, DOI: 10.3280/DT2022-035005