Regulation through artifacts.

Author/s Giuseppe Lorini, Olimpia G. Loddo, Stefano Moroni
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/1 Language Italian
Pages 22 P. 173-194 File size 231 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2022-001008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

When we think about artifacts, we usually consider objects such as, for example, a nutcracker, a screwdriver, a bicycle, a table, a fountain pen, a toothbrush, a food mixer; that is, material objects designed and constructed to perform a ‘technical functiom’. However, there are also artifacts with which we normatively regulate behaviors. Imagine, for example, driving a car along an urban road. We would constantly encounter road signs, traffic lights, roundabouts. We propose to call this specific type of artifacts with normative intent ‘deontic artifacts’. This article aims to investigate this normative phenomenon that is so widespread in our daily reality, but so often forgotten by scholars of norms and normativity.

Keywords: Normativity - regulation - artifacts - discrimination - nudge - deontology

  1. Amselek, Paul, 1993. Les règles juridiques en tant qu’objets mentaux. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 79, 3:311-20.
  2. Bobbio, Norberto, 1958. Teoria della norma giuridica. Torino: Giappichelli.
  3. Bühler, Karl, 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer. Traduzione italiana di Serena Cattaruzza Derossi: Teoria del linguaggio. La funzione rappresentativa del linguaggio. Roma: Armando Editore, 1983.
  4. Caraban, Ana, Evangelos Karapanos, Daniel Gonçalves, & Pedro Campos, 2019. 23 Ways to Nudge: A Review of Technology-Mediated Nudging in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
  5. Cassirer, Ernst, 1944. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  6. Churchland, Patricia S., 2011. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells us about Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  7. Cominelli, Luigi, 2019. “Road Rules”: Analyzing Traffic Signs through a Socio-Cognitive Approach. Phenomenology and Mind, 17:122-134. DOI: 10.13128/PAM-8031
  8. Conte, Amedeo G., 1962. Saggio sulla completezza degli ordinamenti giuridici. Torino: Giappichelli.
  9. Conte, Amedeo G., 1992. Deontica aristotelica. Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto, 69: 178-252.
  10. Crilly, Nathan, 2011. Do Users Know What Designers Are up to? Product Experience and the Inference of Persuasive Intentions. International Journal of Design, 5, 3:1-15.
  11. Damasio, Antonio R., 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
  12. Dipert, Randall, 1993. Artifacts, Art Works, & Agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  13. Dipert, Randall, 1995 Some Issues in the Theory of Artifacts: Defining ‘Artifact’ and Related Notions. The Monist, 78, 2:119-135.
  14. Dudek, Michał, 2015. Why Are Words Not Enough? Or a Few Remarks on Traffic Signs. In Michał Araszkiewicz, Paweł Banaś, Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki, e Krzysztof Płeszka (eds.), Problems of Normativity, Rules and Rule-Following, Law and Philosophy Library, Cham: Springer.
  15. Fujii, Naotaka, & Iriki Atsushi, 2012. Social Rules and Body Scheme. In Frans B.M. de Waal e Pier Francesco Ferrari (eds.), The Primate Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  16. Fuselli, Stefano, 2014. Diritto, neuroscienze, filosofia. Un itinerario. Milano: FrancoAngeli,
  17. García Máynez, Eduardo, 1950. Los principios jurídicos de contradicción y de tercero excluido. Filosofía y letras 19: 47-62.
  18. Gioja, Ambrosio L., 1973. La distinción entre lo real y lo irreal en E. Husserl. In Ambrosio L. Gioja, Ideas para una filosofía del derecho. Buenos Aires: Sucesión de Ambrosio L. Gioja.
  19. Halstrøm, Per Liljenberg. 2017. Rhetorical Tools for Discovery and Amplification of Design Arguments. Design Issues 33, 1: 3-16.
  20. Hare, Richard Mervyn, 1949. Imperative Sentences. Mind 58, 229: 21-39.
  21. Hare, Richard Mervyn, 1952. The Language of Morals. Reprinted. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  22. Hart, Herbert L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Traduzione italiana di Mario A. Cattaneo: Il concetto di diritto. Torino: Einaudi, 1965.
  23. Hayek, Friedrich A. von, 1997. Law, Legislation and Liberty. A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  24. Houkes, Wybo, 2013. Technical Functions. Dordrecht: Springer.
  25. Houkes, Wybo, & Pieter E. Vermaas, 2004. Actions Versus Functions: A Plea for an Alternative Metaphysics of Artifacts. The Monist, 87, 1:52-71.
  26. Hughes, Jesse, 2009. An Artifact Is to Use: An Introduction to Instrumental Functions. Synthese, 168, 1:179-99.
  27. Hull, Gordon, 2012. Coding the Dictatorship of ‘the They:’ A Phenomenological Critique of Digital Rights Management. In Mark Sanders e Jeremy Wisnewski (eds.), Ethics and Phenomenology, Lanham MD: Lexington Books.
  28. Husserl, Edmund, 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Prag: Academie Verlagsbuchhandlung.
  29. Kahneman, Daniel, 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  30. Kahneman, Daniel, & Amos Tversky, 1972. Subjective Probability: A Judgement of Representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3: 430-454. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_
  31. Kalinowski, Jerzy, 1953. Teoria zdań normatywnych–Théorie des propositions normatives. Studia logica, 1:113-84.
  32. Kelsen, Hans, [1934]2008. Reine Rechtslehre. Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Traduzione italiana di Renato Treves: Lineamenti di dottrina pura del diritto. Torino: Einaudi, 1967.
  33. Kelsen, Hans, 1965. Eine phänomenologische Rechtstheorie. Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 15: 353-409. Traduzione italiana di Giuliana Stella: Una teoria fenomenologica del diritto. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 1990.
  34. Kiskola, Joel, Thomas Olsson, Heli Väätäjä, Aleksi H. Syrjämäki, Anna Rantasila, Poika Isokoski, Mirja Ilves, & Veikko Surakka. 2021. Applying Critical Voice in Design of User Interfaces for Supporting Self-Reflection and Emotion Regulation in Online News Commenting. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
  35. Latour, Bruno. 1992. Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Wiebe E. Bijker e John Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  36. Latour, Bruno, 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  37. Lorini, Giuseppe, 2000. Dimensioni giuridiche dell’istituzionale. Padova: CEDAM.
  38. Lorini, Giuseppe 2011. Norma nuda. Un concetto ipotetico. In Studi in onore di Franco Modugno. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
  39. Lorini, Giuseppe 2012. Il valore logico delle norme. Bari: Adriatica Divisione Arte.
  40. Lorini, Giuseppe 2015. La norma disegnata. In Pierluigi Lecis, Vinicio Busacchi, & Pietro Salis (a cura di), Realtà, verità, rappresentazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  41. Lorini, Giuseppe, 2017. Il comportamento nomico degli animali non-umani. Verso un’etologia della normatività. Sociologia del diritto, 44, 3: 77-105. DOI: 10.3280/SD2017-003004
  42. Lorini, Giuseppe, 2019. Corporeal Drawn Norms. An Investigation of Graphic Normativity in the Material World of Everyday Objects. Phenomenology and Mind, 17: 80-90.
  43. Lorini, Giuseppe, & Olimpia G. Loddo, 2017. Il luogo delle norme. Un’indagine sulle dimensioni spaziali delle norme giuridiche. Sociologia del diritto, 1: 77-102. DOI: 10.3280/SD2017-001005.
  44. Lorini, Giuseppe, & Francesco Marrosu, 2018. How Individual Habits Fit/Unfit Social Norms: From the Historical Perspective to a Neurobiological Repositioning of an Unresolved Problem. Frontiers in Sociology, 3: 1-14.
  45. Lorini, Giuseppe, & Stefano Moroni, 2020a. How to Make Norms with Drawings: An Investigation of Normativity beyond the Realm of Words. Semiotica, 233: 55-76.
  46. Lorini, Giuseppe, 2020b. Ruling without Rules: Not Only Nudges. Regulation beyond Normativity. Global Jurist, 20, 3.
  47. Lorini, Giuseppe, 2021. Rule‐free Regulation. Exploring Regulation without Rules and Apart from Deontic. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour: 1-15.
  48. MacCormick, Neil, & Ota Weinberger, 1986. An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  49. Mally, Ernst, 1926. Grundgesetze des Sollens: Elemente der Logik des Willens. Graz: Leuschner & Lubensky.
  50. Margolis, Joseph, 1983. Culture and Cultural Entities. Toward a New Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  51. Maynard, Patrick, 2017. Drawn Norms: The Example of Traffic Signs. In Pierluigi Lecis, Giuseppe Lorini, Vinicio Busacchi, Pietro Salis, & Olimpia G. Loddo (eds.), Truth, Image, Normativity, Macerata: Quodlibet.
  52. Moroni, Stefano, & Giuseppe Lorini, 2017. Graphic Rules in Planning: A Critical Exploration of Normative Drawings Starting from Zoning Maps and Form-based Codes. Planning Theory, 16, 3: 318-338.
  53. Norman, Donald, 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
  54. Nozick, Robert, 2001. Invariances. The Structure of the Objective World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  55. Olivecrona, Karl, 1942. Lagens imperative. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
  56. Olivecrona, Karl 1971. Law as Fact. London: Stevens & Sons.
  57. Panksepp, Jaak, 1998. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. Panksepp, Jaak, & Lucy Biven, 2012. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotion. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  59. Petoft, Arian, 2015. Neurolaw: A Brief Introduction. Iranian Journal of Neurology, 14(1): 53-58.
  60. Petoft, Arian, & Mahmoud Abbasi, 2020. Current Limits of Neurolaw: A Brief Overview, Médecine & Droit, 161: 29-34.
  61. Ross, Alf, 1959. On Law and Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Traduzione italiana di Giacomo Gavazzi: Diritto e giustizia. Torino: Einaudi, 1965.
  62. Sacco, Rodolfo, 1993. Il diritto muto. Rivista di diritto civile, 39: 689-702.
  63. Sacco, Rodolfo, 1994. L’occupazione, atto di autonomia. Rivista di diritto civile, 40: 343-358.
  64. Sacco, Rodolfo, 2005. Il fatto, l’atto, il negozio. Con la collaborazione di Paola Risiano. Torino: UTET.
  65. Sacco, Rodolfo, 2007. Antropologia giuridica. Contributo ad una macrostoria del diritto. Bologna: il Mulino.
  66. Sacco, Rodolfo 2010. Azione, pensiero, parola nella creazione del diritto. In Jacqueline Visconti (a cura di), Lingua e diritto. Livelli di analisi. Milano: LED.
  67. Sacco, Rodolfo, 2015. Il diritto muto. Neuroscienze, conoscenza tacita, valori condivisi. Bologna: il Mulino.
  68. Scarpelli, Uberto, 1953. Elementi di analisi della proposizione giuridica. Jus, 4: 42-51.
  69. Scarpelli, Uberto 1959. Contributo alla semantica del linguaggio normativo. Torino: Accademia delle scienze. Nuova edizione con introduzione a cura di Anna Pintore, Milano: Giuffrè 1985.
  70. Searle, John R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  71. Scarpelli, Uberto 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Allen Lane.
  72. Scarpelli, Uberto, 2001. Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  73. Scarpelli, Uberto 2010. Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  74. Scarpelli, Uberto, 2020. Semiotics as a Theory of Representation. Teoria e critica della regolazione sociale, 1: 49-57. DOI: 10.7413/19705476017
  75. Sellars, Wilfrid, 1950. Language, Rules and Behavior. In Sidney Hook (ed.), John Dewey: Philosopher of Science and Freedom. New York: Barnes & Noble.
  76. Studnicki, Franciszek, 1970. Traffic Signs. Semiotica, 2, 2:151-72.
  77. Thaler, Richard H., 2015. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics. New York-London: W.W. Norton & Co.
  78. Thaler, Richard H., & Cass R. Sunstein, 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  79. Tversky, Amos, & Daniel Kahneman, 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 4157: 1124-1131.
  80. Vermaas, Pieter E, 2006. Technical Functions: A Drawbridge between the Intentional and Structural Natures of Technical Artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37, 1: 5-18.
  81. Vermaas, Pieter E, & Wybo Houkes, 2003. Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 2: 261-89.
  82. Weinberger, Ota, 1986. The Norm as Thought and as Reality. In Neil MacCormick & Ota Weinberger (eds.), An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism, Law and Philosophy Library, Dordrecht: Springer.
  83. Wright, Georg Henrik von, 1951. Deontic Logic. Mind, New Series, 60:1‐15.
  84. Wright, Georg Henrik von, 1963. Norm and Action. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Giuseppe Lorini, Olimpia G. Loddo, Stefano Moroni, Regolare con artefatti in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2022, pp 173-194, DOI: 10.3280/SD2022-001008