Public Buildings of mature costructivism as an instrument of collectivist ideology

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Maria Mikaelyan
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2022/101 Language Italian
Pages 7 P. 62-68 File size 318 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2022-101007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The period 1925-1932 corresponds to the mature phase of constructivism, which was based on the constant rise and consolidation of the Soviet working class. The workers ‘clubs represented a new typology of the local cultural institution to promote proletarian education and collectivist ideology with great possibilities for workers’ control and propaganda. Today, the lack of understanding of the heritage values, the low awareness of the relationship between past and present, the absence of methodological approaches for architectural recovery, they highlight among the main problem of the constructivism legacy. The analysis of some recent projects shows often radical compositional alterations, qualitatively questionable, harmful to the integrity of the monuments.

Keywords: architectural heritage; workers’ club; Russia

  1. Anderson R., 2015, Russia: Modern Architectures in History. London: Reaktion Books.
  2. Applebaum A., 2004, Gulag: storia dei campi di concentramento sovietici, trad. di L.A. Dalla Fontana. Milano: Mondadori (ed. or., 2003, Gulag: A History. New York: Doubleday).
  3. Bardelli P.G., 1990, «La globalità dell’intervento di recupero come me- diazione fra culture di orizzonti diversi». In: Id., Innaurato E., Caldera C., Moglia G., Zampicinini F. (a cura di), Il recupero. Metodi e modi. Milano: be-ma: 12-15.
  4. Bronovitskaja A., Bronovitskaja N., 2006, Arkhitektura Moskvy: 1920-1960. Putevoditel [Architettura di Mosca: 1920-1960. Guida]. Moskva: Giraf.
  5. Chmelnizki D., 2017, «Nikolaj Miljutins ‘Sozgorod’ vor dem Hintergrund der sowjetischen Geschichte». In: Miljutin N., Sozgorod und die Planung sozialistischer Städte, a cura di D. Chmelnizki. Berlin: Dom Publishers: iv-xv.
  6. Čužak N.F., 1923, «Pod znakom žiznestroenija» [«All’insegna della costruzione della vita»]. LEF, 1: 12-39.
  7. Conquest R., 2008, The Great Terror. A Reassessment. London: Pimlico (I ed., 1968).
  8. Cooke C., 1995, Russian Avant-Garde. Theories of Art, Architecture and the City. London: Academy Editions.
  9. Dezzi Bardeschi M., 2016, «Abbecedario minimo per il restauro, oggi. Parte settima (Q-R)». ’Ananke, 78: 31-44.
  10. Duškina N., 2008, «Heritage at Risk: The Fate of Modernist Buildings in Russia». Future Anterior, n. spec. su «Preservation of Soviet Heritage», 5, 1: 1-16.
  11. Galliani P., 2009, «Recupero architettonico: problematiche e questioni di metodo». Territorio, 51: 97-102. DOI: 10.3280/TR2009-051018
  12. Galliani P., 2012, «Identità dell’architettura del xx secolo e progetto contemporaneo». Territorio, 62: 76-80.
  13. Glatzer Rosenthal B., 2002, New Myth, New World. From Nietzsche to Stalinism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  14. Groys B., 1992, Lo stalinismo ovvero l’opera d’arte totale, trad. di E. Guercetti. Milano: Garzanti (ed. or., 1988, Gesamtkunstwerk Stalin. Munich: Hanser).
  15. Kazus I.A., 2009, Sovetskaija arkhitektura 1920-kh godov. Organizatsija proektirovanija [Architettura sovietica negli anni ’20. Organizzazione del progetto]. Moskva: Progress-Traditsija.
  16. Khan-Magomedov S.O., 1990, Konstantin Melnikov. Moskva: Strojizdat. Khan-Magomedov S.O., 2003, Konstruktivizm: kontseptsija formoobrazo- vanija [Costruttivismo. Concetto di modellazione]. Moskva: Strojizdat. Lavrentiev A.N., Bowlt J.E., 2005, Aleksandr Rodchenko. Experiments for the Future. Diaries, Essays, Letters, and Other Writings. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
  17. Lavrentiev A.N., 2007, Istorija dizajna [Storia del design]. Moskva: Gardariki.
  18. Mally L., 1990, Culture of the Future. The Proletkult Movement in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Michel A., 2012, «The False Collective. Carl Einstein and the Russian Avant-Garde». In: Creighton N., Kramer A. (eds.), Carl Einstein und die europäische Avantgarde / Carl Einstein and the European Avant-Garde. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH: 242-254.
  20. «Moscow Declaration on the Preservation of 20th-Century Cultural Heritage 2006». In: Haspel J., Petzet M., Zalivako A., Ziesemer J. (a cura di), 2007, Heritage at Risk: Special 2006. Berlin: Hendrik Bäßler Verlag: 11-12.
  21. Quilici V., 1981, «Introduction». In: Khan-Magomedov S.O., Ivan Leonidov. New York: Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies-Rizzoli: 3-14. Siegelbaum L.H., Suny R.G., 1994, «Class Backwards? In: Search of the Soviet Working Class». In: Id., Suny R.G. (a cura di), Making Workers Soviet. Power, Class, and Identity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press: 1-26.
  22. Solovev N.K., 2004, Istorija sovremennogo inter’jera [Storia degli interni moderni]. Moskva: Svarog&K.
  23. Trockij L. 1973, Letteratura e rivoluzione, trad. di V. Strada. Torino: Einaudi (ed. or., 1923, Literatura i revoluzija, Mosca: Krasnaja Nov’). Viola L., 1996, Peasant Rebels Under Stalin. Collectivization and the Cul- ture of Peasant Resistance. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.

Maria Mikaelyan, Edifici pubblici del costruttivismo maturo come strumento dell’ideologia collettivistica in "TERRITORIO" 101/2022, pp 62-68, DOI: 10.3280/TR2022-101007