Presentation of the body image on facebook. A survey of the new supports for adolescent egos

Journal title RICERCA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Paola Corsano, Claudia Zilioli, Giovanni Zorzi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/2
Language Italian Pages 20 P. 71-90 File size 641 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2014-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper describes a survey on the relation between selection and editing of pictures posted on Facebook and body image in adolescence. 588 young persons (296 males and 292 females) aged between 12 and 19 (average 15.9, standard deviation 1.9) were administered the Pubertal Developmental Scale (Petersen et al, 1988), the Body Esteem Scale (Mendelson, Mendelson, White, 2001) and a questionnaire on picture editing prepared for this study. Data shows (especially for girls) an inverse correlation between editing of pictures and body esteem, age and perception of pubertal development. For all subjects the distress deriving from seeing one’s physical flaws on Facebook is negatively correlated with body esteem. Data shows that selection and editing of pictures posted on Facebook in the case of girls with low body esteem is aimed at showing an improved body image. The study suggests some reflections on the role of social networks in the process of acceptance of one’s body and of identity construction in adolescence.

Keywords: Body image, self-esteem, social networks, adolescence, communication through computers, photoediting

  1. Aliprandi M.T., Pelanda E. e Senise T. (1990). Psicoterapia breve di individuazione. La metodologia di Tommaso Senise nella consultazione con l’adolescente. Milano: Feltri-nelli.
  2. Bell B.T. and Dittmar H. (2011). Does media type matter? The role of identification in adolescent girls’ media consumption and the Internet of different thin-ideal media on body image. Sex Roles, 65: 478-490. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-9964-x
  3. Caretti V. and La Barbera D. (2001). Psicopatologia delle realtà virtuali. Milano: Masson.
  4. Cellucci C. ( 2005). Mente incarnata e conoscenza. In: Canone E., a cura di, Per una storia del concetto di mente (pp. 383-410). Firenze: Olschki.
  5. Ellison N., Heino R. and Gibbs J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communi-cation, 11, 2: 415-441. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
  6. Erikson E.H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton & Company.
  7. Fonagy P. and Target M. (2002). Lo sviluppo normale e il breakdown in adolescenza. Infanzia e Adolescenza, 1: 12-23.
  8. Fonagy P. and Target M. (2011). Le radici nella mente del corpo. Nuovi legami tra teoria dell’attaccamento e psicoanalisi. Psiche. Rivista di Cultura Psicoanalitica, 1, 1-23.
  9. Gatti E. (2012). “Specchio, specchio delle mie brame….” La percezione dell’immagine cor-porea in adolescenza tra percorsi di ricerca e intervento. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  10. Junghyun K. and Jong-Eun R. L. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyber-psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 6: 359-364. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.20-10.0374
  11. Lancini M. and Turuani L. (2009). Sempre in contatto: Relazioni virtuali in adolescenza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Maggiolini A. and Pietropolli Charmet G. (2004). Manuale di psicologia dell’adolescenza. Compiti e conflitti. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Marcia J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In: Adelson J., a cura di, Handbook of Adole-scent Psychology. New York: Wiley.
  14. Mendelson B. K., Mendelson M. J. and White D. R. (2001). Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 1: 90-106. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6
  15. Montesarchio G. and Venuleo C. (2009). La formazione clinica alla clinica. Un approccio contestuale all’uso del gruppo esperienziale. Rivista di psicologia Clinica, 2, 106-120.
  16. Palmonari A. (a cura di) (2011). Psicologia dell’adolescenza. Bologna: il Mulino.
  17. Petersen A. C., Crockett L., Richards M. H. and Boxer, A. M. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17: 117-133. DOI: 10.1007/BF01537962
  18. Rauste von Wright M. (1989). Body image satisfaction in adolescent girls and boys: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 1: 71-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF-02139247
  19. Ricciardelli L. and McCabe M. (2011). Body image development in adolescent boys. In: Cash T. e Pruzinsky T., a cura di, Body image: A handbook of theory, research and clinical practice, (pp. 85-92). New York: Guilford Press.
  20. Tonioni F. (2010). “Intervento presentato al Convegno AUSL Parma Nuove dipendenze e differenziazione dei percorsi di cura: Dipendenza da internet e psicopatologia web mediata, Parma, 9 novembre.
  21. Vegetti Finzi S. and Battistin A.M. (2000). L’età incerta. I nuovi adolescenti. Milano: Mondadori.
  22. Walther J. and Burgoon J. (1992). Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 1: 50-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x

Paola Corsano, Claudia Zilioli, Giovanni Zorzi, Presentazione dell’immagine corporea su Facebook: un’indagine sui nuovi supporti all’Io adolescente in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 2/2014, pp 71-90, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2014-002005