Women’s (and gender) history: Three journals compared
Journal title PASSATO E PRESENTE
Author/s Simonetta Soldani, Giulia Calvi, Françoise Thébaud
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/94 Language Italian
Pages 31 P. 15-45 File size 196 KB
DOI 10.3280/PASS2015-094002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
While in the Anglo- American world women’s and gender history led to a real "refoundation" of the historiographical "common sense", in France and in Italy there has been widespread resistance to this new area of study. History journals are a testimony to this: they struggle to deal with the issues posed by women’s and gender history. At the same time, in both France and Italy there are two journals specifically devoted to the latter, «Clio» and «Genesis»; their experiences are here compared with those of a "generalist" journal such as «Passato e presente».
Keywords: History journals, Women’s history, Gender history
Simonetta Soldani, Giulia Calvi, Françoise Thébaud, La storia delle donne (e di genere): tre riviste a confronto in "PASSATO E PRESENTE" 94/2015, pp 15-45, DOI: 10.3280/PASS2015-094002