The Psychic Mechanisms of the Relationship between Reality and Psychosis

Journal title PSICOANALISI
Author/s Jacqueline Amati Mehler
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/2
Language Italian Pages 19 P. 5-23 File size 220 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSI2016-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The author explores the vicissitudes of the reality principle that called Freud’s attention quite early on and engaged his thinking throughout his life time. At the beginning of Freud’s investigation distortions of reality usually were associated with psychosis. However, the term psychosis has also been and continues to be far from being univocally defined, both from a theoretical and a clinical perspective. Freudian and post Freudian developments ¬both theoretical and clinical - have provided psychoanalysts with a better understanding of early primary psychic vicissitudes at play in many different pathologies placed under the general umbrella of psychosis. A better understanding of such pathologies, placed under the umbrella of psychosis, necessarily confronts us with the need to review the criteria of analysability or that of non analysability.

.

Keywords: Psychosis, internal reality, external reality, analysability.

  1. Amati Mehler J. (2000a). Psicoanalisi: teoria e tecnica oggi. Psicoanalisi, 4, 1: 39.
  2. Amati Mehler J. (2000b). Das Ich gestern und heute. In: Das Ich – eine vernachlässigte Instanz? Tagungsband der DPV-Arbeitstagung vom 1.-4. München: Wolfgang-Loch-Stigtung.
  3. Amati Mehler J. (2001). L’Io ieri e oggi. Psicoanalisi, 5, 2: 139.
  4. Amati Mehler J., Argentieri S., Canestri J., (1993 [2010]). Das Babel des Umbewussten: Muttersprache und Fremdsprachen in der Psychoanalyse. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
  5. Amati Mehler J. (2004). Mélancolie: folie, génie ou tristesse? Les vicissitudes de l’identification et de la formation du moi. Rev. franç. Psychanal., 4: 334.
  6. Arlow J. A., Brenner C. (1969). The Psychopathology of the Psychoses: A Proposed Revision. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 50: 5.
  7. Bleger J. (1973). Simbiosis y Ambiguidad. Buenos Aires: Paidos (trad. it. Simbosi e ambiguità. Roma: Armando, 2010).
  8. Bleuler. E (1911). Dementia Praecox, oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Leipzig - Vienna: Deuticke.
  9. Canestri, J. (1993). Il Soggetto Polilogico. In: Ri-Scritture. Torino: Eurelle Edizioni.
  10. Eissler K. R. (1953). The Effect of the Structure of the Ego on Psychoanaytic Technique. IJPA 1, 1: 104-143.
  11. Freud S. (1892-1894). Le neuropsicosi da difesa. In: Opere, vol. 2. Torino: Boringhieri, 1968).
  12. Freud S. (1893-1895). Studi sull’isteria. In: Opere, vol. 2. Torino: Boringhieri, 1968.
  13. Freud S. (1909). Some General Remarks on Hysterical Attacks. In: SE, IX, pp. 231-232.
  14. Freud S. (1923). L’organizzazione genitale infantile. In: Opere, vol. 9. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  15. Freud S. (1923). L’Io e l’Es. In: Opere, vol. 9. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  16. Freud S. (1924). Nevrosi e psicosi. In: Opere, vol. 9. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  17. Freud S. (1924). La Perdita di realtà nella nevrosi e nella psicosi. In: Opere, vol. 10. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978.
  18. Freud S. (1929). Il disagio della civiltà. In: Opere, vol. 10. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978.
  19. Freud S. (1938). La scissione dell’Io nel processo di difesa. In: Opere, vol. 11. Torino: Boringhieri, 1979.
  20. Freud S. (1937). Analisi terminabile e interminabile. In: Opere, vol. 11. Torino: Boringhieri, 1979.
  21. Freud S. (1938). Compendio di psicoanalisi. In: Opere, vol. 11. Torino: Boringhieri, 1979.
  22. Freud S. (1950 [1887-1902]). Progetto di una psicologia. In: Opere, vol. 2. Torino: Boringhieri, 1968.
  23. Glover E. (1930). Grades of Ego Differentiation. IJPA, 11, 1: 1-11.
  24. Meltzer D. (1967). The Psychoanalytic Process. London: Heinemann (trad. it. Il processo psicoanalitico. Roma: Armando, 1971).
  25. Modell A. H. (1975). The Ego and the Id: Fifty Years Later. IJPA, 56,1: 57-68.
  26. Rosenfeld H. (1958). Discussion on Ego Distortion. IJPA, 39, 2: 274-275.
  27. Sandler J. (1976). Countertransference and role responsiveness. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 3: 43-47.
  28. Sandler J. (1993). On Communication from Patient to Analyst: Not everything is projective identification. IJPA, 74, 6: 1097-1107.
  29. Segal H., Britton R. (1981). Interpretation and Primitive Psychic Processes: A Kleinian View. Psychoanal. Inq., 1: 267-277.
  30. Schafer R. (2007). The Reality Principle, Tragic Knots, and the Analytic Process. JAPA, 55, 4: 1151. DOI: 10.1177/000306510705500403

Jacqueline Amati Mehler, I meccanismi psichici del rapporto fra realtà e psicosi in "PSICOANALISI" 2/2016, pp 5-23, DOI: 10.3280/PSI2016-002001