Convivial conservation, ecomuseums and community of practice: The case of the Ecomuseo delle Erbe Palustri in Villanova.

Journal title RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA
Author/s Carolina Pascali, Andrea Zinzani
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2026/3
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 100-120 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rgioa3-2026oa23547
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Within debates in geography and the social sciences on heritage, ecomuseums have increasingly been analysed as multidimensional socio-spatial entities encompassing a wide range of dimensions, including community, educational, socio-political, and environmental aspects. In this regard, they have often been recognised as promoters of narratives and practices capable of transcending the dualistic perspective that positions society and nature as separate and opposing spheres. Building on the need to move beyond this dualism, and drawing on a dialogue between the literature on convivial conservation and critical heritage studies, this paper explores the potential prerequisites for the development of convivial management approaches within ecomuseums. It focuses on the heritage context of the Ecomuseo delle Erbe Palustri in Villanova di Bagnacavallo (Ravenna, Italy). Employing an ethnographic approach, the study examines the strategies adopted by the ecomuseum community and other stakeholders involved in the process of local territorial transformation. The findings highlight both the opportunities and, more importantly, the limitations inherent in efforts to foster a sense of community at the local level.

Keywords: convivial conservation, ecomuseums, community of practice, heritage.

  1. Aime M., Papotti D. (2012). L’altro e l’altrove. Antropologia geografia turismo. Torino: Einaudi.
  2. Bagnari V. (1987). Villanova civiltà palustre. Lugo: Walberti Edizioni.
  3. Boatti A. (2004). Gli ecomusei in Italia e in Europa tra paesaggio e folklore. Una risorsa per la valorizzazione del territorio. Ri-Vista Ricerche per la progettazione del paesaggio, 1: 1-12. DOI: 10.13128/RV-17535
  4. Bolognesi D., Giovannini C. (2019). Lucio Gambi, Ravenna e la Romagna: un geografo per la storia. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
  5. Borrelli N., Davis P. (2012). How culture shapes nature: Reflection on ecomuseums practice. Nature and Culture, 7(2): 31-47. DOI: 10.3167/nc.2012.070103
  6. Borrelli N., Ge R. (2019). An analysis of Chinese ecomuseums in relation to ecomuseum theories and principles. ORGANON, 51: 123-151. DOI: 10.4467/00786500.ORG.19.005.11326
  7. Borrelli N., Davis P., Dal Santo R. (2022). Ecomuseums and Climate Change. Milano: Ledizioni.
  8. Breda N. (2000). I respiri della palude. Roma: CISU.
  9. Broccolini A., De Grazia D. (2025). L’ecomuseo e il “quarto pilastro” del patrimonio. Tra storytelling e metanarrazione. Dada Rivista di Antropologia Post-Globale, 1: 55-90. Il testo è consultabile al sito <a href="https://dadarivista.com/Archivio/2025-DADA-n1-Speciale-Ecomusei.pdf">https://dadarivista.com/Archivio/2025-DADA-n1-Speciale-Ecomusei.pdf</a> (consultato il 20 aprile 2026).
  10. Brockington D. (2004). Community conservation, inequality and injustice: Myths of power in protected area management. Conservation & Society, 2(2): 411-432.
  11. Graham B., Ashworth G.J., Tunbridge J.E. (2000). A Geography of Heritage. Power, Culture and Economy. London: Arnold.
  12. Brown T., Phillips C., Shoaib Ali S. (2024). Skill acquisition within a (more-than-human) community of practice: A study of beekeeping in Punjab, India. Journal of Rural Studies, 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103358
  13. Büscher B., Fletcher R. (2019). Towards convivial conservation. Conservation and Society, 17(3): 283-296. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_19_75
  14. Büscher B., Fletcher R. (2020). The Conservation Revolution. Radical Ideas for saving Nature Beyond the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
  15. Cannizzaro S. (2020). Ecomuseo dell’Etna. Tra natura, mito e cultura. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.
  16. Castronovo V. (1995). Lo sviluppo economico in Italia nel cinquantennio repubblicano. Problemi aperti. Studi Storici, 1: 215-231.
  17. Castiglioni B., Puttilli M., Tanca M., a cura di (2021). Oltre la Convenzione. Pensare, studiare, costruire il paesaggio vent’anni dopo. Firenze: Società di Studi Geografici.
  18. Cisani M., Castiglioni B., Di Matteo, G. (2025). Patrimoni oltre natura e cultura. Le riserve della biosfera UNESCO in Italia. Milano: Mimesis.
  19. Consiglio d’Europa (2000). Convenzione Europea del Paesaggio. Firenze, 20 ottobre 2000.
  20. Corsane G., Davis P., Elliott S., Maggi M., Murtas D., Rogers S. (2007). Ecomuseum evaluation: Experiences in Piemonte and Liguria, Italy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 13(2): 101-116. DOI: 10.1080/13527250601118936
  21. Davis P. (2011). Ecomuseums: A Sense of Place. London and New York: Leicester University Press/Continuum.
  22. Davis P. (2007). Ecomuseums and sustainability in Italy, Japan and China: Concept adaptation through implementation. In: Knell S., Macleod S., Watson S., a cura di, Museum Revolutions: How Museums Change and are Changed. London: Routledge.
  23. Davis P. (2009). Ecomuseums and the representation of place. Rivista Geografica Italiana, 116(4): 483-503.
  24. de Varine H. (1976). La culture des autres. Parigi: Seuil.
  25. de Varine H. (1996). Ecomuseums or community museums? 25 years of applied research in museology and development. Nordisk Museologi, 2(2): 1-26. DOI: 10.5617/nm.3673
  26. de Varine H. (2005). Le radici del futuro. Il patrimonio culturale al servizio dello sviluppo locale. Bologna: CLUEB.
  27. de Varine H. (2021). L’ecomuseo singolare e plurale. Una testimonianza su cinquant’anni di museologia comunitaria nel mondo. Gemona del Friuli: Utopie Concrete.
  28. De Marco E.L., Fiore I. (2025). L’ecomuseo: tra decostruzione delle narrazioni dominanti e nuove prospettive. Dada Rivista di Antropologia Post-Globale, 1: 91-109. Il testo è consultabile al sito <a href="https://dadarivista.com/Archivio/2025-DADA-n1-Speciale-Ecomusei">https://dadarivista.com/Archivio/2025-DADA-n1-Speciale-Ecomusei</a>.
  29. pdf (consultato il 20 aprile 2026).
  30. Desvallées A., de Bary M.O., Wasserman F. (1992-1994). Vagues: une anthologie de la nouvelle muséologie I-II. Paris: Editions W. Mâcon.
  31. Donald J., Rattansi A., a cura di (1992). Race, Culture and Difference. London: Sage/Open University.
  32. Edensor T. (1997). National identity and the politics of memory: Remembering Bruce Wallace in symbolic space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29: 175-194. DOI: 10.1068/d150175
  33. Garden M.C.E. (2006). The heritagescape: Looking at landscapes of the past. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(5): 32-44.
  34. Gillot L., Maffi I., Trémon A.C. (2013). “Heritage-scape” or “heritage-scapes”? Critical considerations on a concept. Ethnologies, 35(2): 3-29.
  35. Grasseni C., a cura di (2010). Ecomuseologie. Pratiche e interpretazioni del patrimonio locale. Rimini: Guaraldi Edizioni.
  36. Guarrasi V. (2001). Paradoxes of modern and postmodern geography: Heterotopia of landscape and cartographic logic. In: Minca C., a cura di, Postmodern Geographies. Theory and Praxis. Oxford: Blackwell.
  37. Harrison R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. London and New York: Routledge.
  38. Harrison R. (2020). Il patrimonio culturale. Torino: Pearson.
  39. Harvey D.C. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4): 319-38. DOI: 10.1080/13581650120105534
  40. Higgins-Desbiolles F. (2010). The elusiveness of sustainability in tourism: The cultureideology of consumerism and its implications. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 10(2): 116-29. DOI: 10.1057/thr.2009.31
  41. Igoe J., Brockington D. (2007). Neoliberal conservation: A brief introduction. Conservation and Society, 5(4): 432-449.
  42. Illich I. (1974). La convivialità. Milano: Mondadori.
  43. Iordăchescu G. (2022). Convivial conservation prospects in Europe: From wilderness protection to reclaiming the commons. Conservation and Society, 20(2): 156-166. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_35_21
  44. Ingold T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2): 152-174. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
  45. Ingold T. (1995). Work, time and industry. Time and Society, 4(1): 5-28. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X9500400100
  46. Ingold T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.
  47. Lattanzi V. (2021). Musei e antropologia. Storie, esperienze, prospettive. Roma: Carocci.
  48. Lave J., Wenger E. (2006). L’apprendimento situato. Gardolo: Erickson.
  49. Li M., Selim G. (2021). Ecomuseums in China: Challenges and defects to the existing practical framework. Heritage, 4: 1868-1882. DOI: 10.3390/heritage4030105
  50. Locke H. (2013). Nature needs half: A necessary and hopeful new agenda for protected areas. PARKS, 19(2): 13-22. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2013.PARKS-19-2.HL.en
  51. Lowenthal D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Lowenthal D. (1996). Possessed by the Past. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. New York: The Free Press.
  53. Maggi M. (2002). Ecomusei: guida europea. Torino: Umberto Allemandi.
  54. Maggi M., a cura di (2005). Museo e cittadinanza. Condividere il patrimonio culturale per promuovere la partecipazione e la formazione civica. Torino: IRES.
  55. Mancini L. (2015). Introduzione all’antropologia giuridica. Torino: Giappichelli.
  56. Martinez-Reyes J.E. (2017). Environmateriality. Exploring the links between political ecology and material culture studies. In: Kopnina H., Shoreman-Ouime E., a cura di, The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology. London: Routledge.
  57. Marvier M. (2013). New conservation is true conservation. Conservation Biology, 28(1): 1-3. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12206
  58. Massarella K., Krauss E.J., Kiwango W.A., Fletcher R. (2022). Exploring convivial conservation in theory and practice: Possibilities and challenges for a transformative approach to biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 20(2): 59-68. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_53_22
  59. Masetti G. (2014). Ecomuseo delle Erbe Palustri di Villanova di Bagnacavallo. Ravenna: Longo Angelo.
  60. Menzani T. (2010). Le bonifiche in Romagna. La realizzazione del Canale in destra di Reno (secc. XVIII-XX). Imola: La Mandragora Editrice.
  61. Messina G., Nicosia E. (2024). Crossed Landscapes: A walking method research experience in Sicily. Geography Notebooks, 7(2): 81-94. DOI: 10.7358/gn-2024-002-meni
  62. Minca C. (2022). Appunti di geografia. Milano: Wolters Kluwer Italia.
  63. Pappalardo G. (2020). Community-based processes for revitalizing heritage: Questioning justice in the experimental practice of ecomuseums. Sustainability, 12: 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su12219270
  64. Piani G. (1914). Piccole industrie locali di Villanova di Bagnacavallo. Ravenna: Tipografia Ravegnana.
  65. Piermattei S. (2007). Antropologia ambientale e paesaggio agrario. Perugia: Morlacchi Editore.
  66. Poulot D. (2018). Musei e museologia. Milano: Jaka Book.
  67. Riva R., a cura di (2017). Ecomuseums and cultural landscapes. State of the art and future prospects. Sant’Arcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
  68. Rivière G.H. (1985). The ecomuseum: An evolutive definition. Museum, XXXVII, 4: 182-184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0033.1985.tb00581.x
  69. Redford K. (1991). The ecologically noble savage. Orion Nature Quarterly. 9: 24-29.
  70. Reina G., a cura di (2014). Gli ecomusei. Una risorsa per il futuro. Venezia: Marsilio.
  71. Robertson I.J., a cura di (2012). Heritage from Below. London: Routledge.
  72. Rolland-Villemot B. (2020). L’écomusée, une nouvelle forme de muséologie à l’international? E-Phaïstos, 8(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.4000/ephaistos.7781
  73. Sobala M. (2016). Landscape effects on conflicts in space management. A historical approach based on the Silesian and Żywiec Beskids (West Carpathians, Poland). Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 4(4): 51-60. DOI: 10.1515/environ-2016-0024
  74. Smith L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London and New York: Routledge.
  75. Tunbridge J.E., Ashworth G. (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. London: Wiley.
  76. Urry J. (1990). The consumption of tourism. Sociology, 24(1): 23-35. DOI: 10.1177/0038038590024001004
  77. Vergo P. (1989). The New Museology. London: Reaktion Books.
  78. Viejo-Rose D. (2011). Reconstructing Spain: Cultural Heritage and Memory after Civil War. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
  79. Winter T. (2013). Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(6): 532-545. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2012.720997
  80. Wells M.P., McShane T.O. (2004). Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio, 33(8): 513-519. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.8.513
  81. Wilson E.O. (2016). Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life. New York: Liveright Pub Corp.
  82. Young J. (1993). The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  83. Zinzani A. (2023). The contested environmental futures of the Dolomites: A political ecology of mountains. Geographica Helvetica, 78: 295-307. DOI: 10.5194/gh-78-295-2023

Carolina Pascali, Andrea Zinzani, Conservazione conviviale, ecomusei e comunità di pratica: il caso dell’Ecomuseo delle Erbe Palustri di Villanova in "RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA" 3/2026, pp 100-120, DOI: 10.3280/rgioa3-2026oa23547